Click to see the best holiday gifts under $25.
Sign In

Here's Why Conflict-Free Diamonds Are a Hoax

Due to loopholes in the system, it's tough to guarantee that your gemstone isn't a blood diamond. But there are steps you can take to be fairly certain.

There's no denying the beauty of a diamond, but some of these stones have ugly origins. Conflict diamond sales can be used to finance violence, and human rights abuses can run rampant in diamond mines. Of course shoppers don't want this shadow hanging over their jewelry.

That's where "conflict-free" diamonds come in. These are diamonds whose origins are purportedly tracked and are certified to have a violence-free pedigree. There's just one problem: An estimated 5% to 10% of diamonds are traded illegally — and consumers may be paying a big upcharge for ethical gems that are anything but.

We'll tell you why real conflict-free diamonds are so hard to find, then offer tips on how you can get truly ethical gems.

Conflict-Free Diamond Certification Is Flawed

The diamond industry has a certification process to assure buyers their gems aren't involved in violence: the Kimberley Process. But the certification has loopholes that allow blood diamonds to go into circulation.

Diamonds may change hands up to 30 times before they reach the reseller you're buying from, and each time there's a chance an unknown diamond has been added to the batch.

The first flaw is in the definition of a blood diamond. The Kimberley Process explicitly defines a conflict diamond as a gem that helps finance "violence by rebel movements and their allies seeking to undermine legitimate governments." The problem with this phrasing is perfectly illustrated by Zimbabwe, where the government kills and tortures mine workers — but the diamonds the country mines are still certified as conflict-free by the Kimberley Process.

As you can see, these conflict-free gems are only guaranteed to be free of one very specific type of conflict. Kimberley Process stones still can (and do) fund human rights abuses.

But the Kimberley Process' limited definition of what makes a conflict diamond actually isn't the biggest issue when it comes to ensuring conflict-free diamonds. The second part of the problem is that it's difficult (or even impossible) to track exactly where an individual diamond comes from.

The Kimberley Process only tracks batches of gems, as opposed to individual stones. Diamonds may change hands up to 30 times before they reach the reseller you're buying from, and each time there's a chance an unknown diamond has been added to the batch.

Because every step in the process isn't tracked and audited for every stone, it's easy for gems to slip into the market from anywhere and still have all the paperwork to assure they're conflict-free.

Even if the Kimberley Process has banned a country from exporting diamonds — as it does with countries that don't meet its standards — those diamonds can be smuggled across borders and then sold as KP-certified gems.

SEE ALSO: You Need to Have These 5 Money Talks Before You Get Married

How Do You Know if You've Bought a Conflict Diamond?

Physically, there's no difference between a conflict diamond and any other diamond. An expert can't examine a diamond and tell you whether it came from a Zimbabwean mine or a Canadian one. Once the gem has changed hands repeatedly and been cut, it's impossible to trace it back to its source.

The sad truth is, you'd probably have no idea if you purchased a conflict diamond. As we've noted, even gems that are Kimberley Process certified or advertised as "ethical" could well be blood diamonds.

What to Look for When Diamond Shopping

It's difficult to be certain a diamond is fully conflict-free, but shoppers can take some steps. Ignore all advertisements about how "ethical" a diamond seller is, and instead ask for proof of where the diamond came from. A responsible reseller should be able to trace the stones to the country (or mine) of origin and provide documentation from its suppliers stating its gems are conflict-free. Any seller who dodges the question is suspicious.

Ignore all advertisements about how 'ethical' a diamond seller is, and instead ask for proof of where the diamond came from.

If the diamond you're considering is from Zimbabwe or Angola, you may want to say no. While there's no guarantee it's a conflict diamond, both countries have bad track records with human rights abuses in their mines. Instead, look for diamonds from a country with a solid human rights reputation, like Namibia and Botswana.

Diamonds from Canada — the third-largest diamond-producing country in the world — offer easy reassurance to shoppers. The country lacks the kind of conflict that might result in a blood diamond, and ensures stones are mined sustainably and ethically. Expect to pay more for a genuine Canadian diamond, but you can buy guilt-free.

A Canadian diamond should come with paperwork verifying its authenticity, and most retailers will allow you to check the diamond's ID online to verify it. A couple of resources to consider are the Canadian Diamond Code of Conduct and CanadaMark, which allow you to verify gems by serial number.

What About Brilliant Earth?

This online diamond retailer advertises that its gems are "beyond conflict free." However, the claim is specious at best — and outright deceptive at worst. A recent investigation by The Next Web suggests the company makes that assertion by not paying very close attention to where its diamonds come from.

SEE ALSO: Everything You Need to Know About Synthetic Diamonds

Though Brilliant Earth gives you its word that its conflict-free stones come from Canada — and gives them the price tag to match — the company can't independently verify the source of its stones. As we mentioned above, Canada keeps close track of its diamonds, which often have unique identification numbers that can tell you exactly where the stones came from. This makes Brilliant Earth's lack of proof tough to believe.

Whoever you're shopping with, remember that if you want an ethical diamond, ask where it came from. If anything the company tells you seems off, just walk away.

Consider Synthetic Diamonds

Lab-grown diamonds have just as much sparkle as their mined counterparts, but you can be assured they aren't blood diamonds. As a bonus, they're often cheaper — especially if you're looking for diamonds in specific colors. You really can't find a better deal in the diamond market.

Readers, have you ever shopped for a conflict-free diamond? What was your experience like? Tell us about it in the comments below.

Contributing Writer

Originally working in IT, Elizabeth now writes on tech, gaming, and general consumer issues. Her articles have appeared in USA Today, Time, AOL, PriceGrabber, and more. She has been one of DealNews' most regular contributors since 2013, researching everything from vacuums to renters insurance to help consumers.
DealNews may be compensated by companies mentioned in this article. Please note that, although prices sometimes fluctuate or expire unexpectedly, all products and deals mentioned in this feature were available at the lowest total price we could find at the time of publication (unless otherwise specified).
You might also like
Leave a comment!

or Register
who can validate anything that's even written HERE
As was said previously, they really are common stones, but DeBeers created a monopoly on them.
It couldn't exist in the US because there would be anti-trust cases against them.
I like the idea of killing their monopoly by getting synthetic diamonds, if you must. It provides funding for alternative diamond sources and may help to eventually break up the ridiculous monopoly.
And eliminate the problem with blood diamonds altogether.
Yes - think about that - the man created scarcity by DeBeers enables the blood diamond market.
Sean Clinton
Documentation supplied by a diamond supplier stating gems are conflict-free isn't worth the paper its written on.
The conflict-free scam was introduced by the World Diamond Council as part of a bogus System of Warranties which the industry uses to con the public into believing the Kimberley Process covers cut and polished diamonds as well as rough diamonds. It doesn't.
According to Cecelia Gardner, President, CEO and General Counsel of the Jewellers Vigilance Committee and General Counsel and Director of the US Kimberley Process Committee who was General Counsel of the WDC, the term conflict-free is "so vague as to have no real meaning".
Most blood diamonds enter the market after mining when the relatively low value rough are cut and polished.
Blood diamonds that fund apartheid, unregulated nukes and war crimes account for 1/5th of market.
Personally I find nearly all diamonds to be pretty boring. There are many more colorful and interesting gems.
Here's the thing about diamonds that doesn't get said enough:
THEY'RE AS COMMON AS AGATES! There's NOTHING "precious" or "rare" about them! DeBeers controls the diamond market; DeBeers controls the hype. Get it in your head: when you think about diamonds, think about those little rocks you pick up on the beach -- your budget will thank you!
The desire to avoid purchases tainted by violence, cruelty, and exploitation is a noble one. Instead of trying to wade through all the documentation -- as though an industry layman could even begin to differentiate real from fake -- why not just dispense with diamonds altogether? Go for precious metals or semi-precious stones, if you need something expensive. Rings have played a huge part in marriage across cultures and centuries. Nothing says they need to have stones.

And, really, if one is going to be scrupulous about buying conflict minerals, maybe it's time to give the SUV and the gas pump second looks. Oil is the other major Angolan export, to say nothing of the Saudis and similar regimes.