The Future Is Now: All the Ways You'll See 4K Content in 2014

From Netflix and Amazon shows filmed in 4K to Sony's collection of upconverted movies, we're already living in a world filled with ultra HD content.
Samsung 4K HDTV

It was only a few months ago when several of us at DealNews looked at 4K technology and asked: "How much resolution do we need?" However, according to every major TV manufacturer's panel at this year's Consumer Electronics Show (CES), 4K is the future of television, whether consumers need it or not. Of course, one of the main arguments against ultra HD has been that no one is making 4K content ... until now.

This week, we've learned that 4K content is more a forgone conclusion than a far-off dream. Companies like Netflix and Amazon have partnered with studios to create native 4K shows and movies, while Sony already boasts a library of up-converted 4K content. One TV manufacturer has bet the farm on 4K, choosing to drop 3D support altogether. With the sudden surge in ultra HD media availability, one thing is certain: the arguments against 4K are getting weaker.

You Can Watch House of Cards and Cat Videos in 4K

Netflix has jumped in bed with Sony, LG, Vizio and Samsung in order to build the buzz around 4K because all of Netflix's original programming will be shot in the ultra HD format from now on. And Netflix isn't wasting any time! According to USA Today, "Netflix CEO Reed Hastings appeared during an LG Electronics press conference at CES on Monday to announce that the second season of House of Cards will be available for streaming in 4K" in February.

Incidentally, if you'd like to (theoretically) view the 4K trailer mentioned above, you can find it on YouTube, viewable thanks to Google's new VP9 codec, which was rolled out just in time for CES. The royalty-free video format supports 4K streaming, but that's not all it can do. In a recent interview with GigaOm, Francisco Varela, Global Director of Platform Partnerships at YouTube, said the new format can even help eliminate buffering on all HD videos: "The use of the codec won't just help YouTube to deliver higher resolutions at reasonable bitrates, but also reduce the amount of data necessary to stream regular HD videos by about half."

Netflix-contender, Amazon is also betting high on 4K having announced last month that all of its 2014 original programming would be filmed in ultra HD. "We're excited about 4K and the future of Ultra HD technology, particularly as we move into drama series next year," Amazon Studios Director Roy Price said in a statement. "We think customers are going to love watching these series in the highest resolution ever available to consumers." Unlike Netflix, thus far Amazon's only partner in the realm of TV manufacturers is Samsung.

TV Manufacturers Offer Multiple 4K Content Avenues

TV manufacturers themselves have been busy developing their own 4K content delivery schematics. Samsung is developing an ecosystem of 4K apps. According to Engadget, "the Korean tech giant has just announced partnerships with companies that will deliver 4K to the masses. Amazon, Comcast/Xfinity, DirecTV, M-Go, and Netflix are all working with Samsung to stream the higher-resolution video format through their native Smart Hub apps."

For its part, Sony is adopting a more holistic approach to providing 4K content to viewers. Last year, the tech giant launched its own 4K digital video store, which features more than 140 movies and TV shows that have been up-converted to the ultra HD format. What's more, "Sony owns a film studio, which means several upcoming major movies are being shot in the ultra high-def format. [The company is] also releasing a new line of cameras and camcorders with 4K recording capability," according to VentureBeat.

However, no one seems to be betting higher on 4K than Vizio. While the company's Chief Technology Officer, Matt McRae, would only tell The Verge that Vizio plans to deliver 4K content through streaming, McRae was confident that Vizio's TVs would be "aggressively" priced. Furthermore, Vizio is so confident that 4K is the wave of the future that it has "done away with 3D playback entirely."

Clearly, a lack of content won't prevent people from purchasing a 4K TV in 2014. Of course, there are other reasons why someone might avoid buying the new TVs, like their massive size or the higher cost associated with brand-name models. Readers, what do you think? Does the sudden availability of 4K content mean you'll switch to the new format? Or will you watch the new season of House of Cards in good ol' HD? Sound off in the comments below!

Michael Bonebright
Former Senior Blog Editor

Michael added the finishing touches to most of the Blog articles on DealNews. His work has appeared on sites like Lifehacker, the Huffington Post, and MSN Money. See him rant about video games by following him on Twitter @ThatBonebright.
DealNews may be compensated by companies mentioned in this article. Please note that, although prices sometimes fluctuate or expire unexpectedly, all products and deals mentioned in this feature were available at the lowest total price we could find at the time of publication (unless otherwise specified).


Leave a comment!

or Register
Well I just purchased a Sony XBR 65" HX950 for a great price from Onecall. It was released at the end of 2012 for $5500 and I picked it up for $2700.00. I looked at the 4K sets Sony is offering and they are only 120hz panels and the older 1080p sets are 240hz and with backlight blinking and such you get 960 motion effect. I am upgrading to a better Set: Full Backlight with Local Dimming,Etc. Remember Sony has said that you can sit 4ft away from your 4K set and I am like so what. I sit 6 to 8 ft away from my TV now. I have a Large Bluray Collection and I prefer purchasing Bluray over Digital Download. What I like is the Free UV codes they give you with Blurays. Best of Both Worlds. Until True 4K BluRays come out. I will sit on the sidelines this time around. And maybe I will pick up a 80 or 90inch 4k set because anything under 80inches isn't worth getting 4k you cannot tell the difference.
What no one in the streaming and remote delivery (cable) industry is addressing is over-compression that makes HDTV look worse than NTSC & 4K won’t fix that. Even uncompressed DVDs — you know the ones that only have a few hours on them & are double layer, vs. the discount 4–8 hours per disc — look better than most content coming out of an HDMI port from a cable box aside from the lower resolution. The artifacts from over compression on gradients is jarring and more pixels won’t help that much. The desire to pack as many channels into the band is killing signal quality. If Comcast, AT&T & DirecTV didn't do this in order to give us 50 channels of shopping networks, then 1080p would be more than enough unless your TV was over 70". Blu-Ray looks better — not only because of the resolution — but because the signal is much less compressed. If content distro companies fixed that, I would consider 4K. For now it is a rip off if you lack the bandwidth.
Something else CABLE Thieves, er I mean cable companies in the USA, can up charge us for if they ever start to carry it. :( Or perhaps they will charge you more for internet since you will be using more bandwidth?
Greg the Gruesome
I saw somewhere that Naughty America, a you-know-what studio, said it will start filming its productions in 4K. }:]
3d passive could be shown in full 1080p on a 4k tv - it's a crime for them not to support that mode. Funny that what they are touting is "up-converted" to 4k which just means most of what you see is 1080p video. Movies like the Hobbit are being shot in high frame rate. Maybe I need to hold out for 4k high frame rate 3d TVs. After all, aren't they blaming the lack of material for the lackluster sales?
I have owned every type of quad in the 70's from qs to cd-4, still listen to sacd's or dvd-a's off the 5.1 inputs [ not the hdmi ], and enjoy 3d active movies off a 73 inch Mitsubishi. If you ever need to know what format will eventually perish, just ask. At least I got Blu-ray right.
If only 3D and 4K weren't incompatible concepts. I feel like I need a TV for each.
It's a shame. The high resolution of 4k would go well with passive interlaced polarized 3D. 3D movies are near dead but 3D gaming hasn't had a chance to shine yet. LG was big on passive 3D. Maybe they will try it.