Sign In

Ask an Expert: Are Smart TVs Ever As Good As Dedicated Streaming Players?

The key is knowing what features you want from streaming. We compare content offerings, interfaces, and more so you can choose the best device for you.
Published
Smart TV

As streaming media sources have become increasingly popular, so too have devices to bring Netflix and more to our television screens. Now our TVs, Blu-ray players, and game consoles can all stream online video. With so many options, is it worth buying a Roku or other dedicated streaming player?

That's exactly what DealNews user "computer parts guy" wants to know:

"Are Smart enabled TVs ever as good as the dedicated set top boxes?"

If your streaming media needs are basic, Smart TVs will let you watch Netflix, Hulu, and other mainstream services just fine. But are they as good as a dedicated streaming device? The short answer is sometimes, but the full explanation is a bit more complicated. Read on to see what streaming media players and Smart TVs offer in terms of content, interface, and other features, so you can pick the best option for you.

Streaming Players Provide Lots of Content Options

While a Smart TV gets you the basics, a dedicated streaming media player will let you watch almost anything. Roku is definitely the king of content, with 3,500-plus streaming channels. Admittedly, that includes a lot of channels you probably don't care about, but the point is that Roku covers everything you're likely to want. For anyone interested in iTunes content, a streaming player is the only way to go: Apple TV is the sole device that supports iTunes. And while not every streaming device is the same, most offer more options than Smart TVs.

Another advantage of a streaming player is the ability to send content from your computer or mobile device to your television screen. It's a good way to watch content your streaming player doesn't have an app for — like playing Amazon Video on an Apple TV — or to just browse the web on a big screen. You can AirPlay to Apple TV from other Apple devices, Cast to Chromecast and Android TV, and mirror your screen to Roku from Android and Windows devices.

One advantage of a streaming player is the ability to send content from your computer or mobile device to your television screen.

Smart TVs can't compete with that variety. Though you can expect Netflix and YouTube as a matter of course, beyond that it's a mixed bag. For example, Vizio Smart TVs won't stream Amazon (though neither will Apple TV) and neither Panasonic nor Vizio stream HBO. LG, Samsung, and Sony Smart TVs offer the most variety, but none of the traditional TV-makers compete with Roku on channel selection.

Some exceptions do exist: Roku TVs and Sony Smart TVs are both essentially TVs with third-party streaming media players baked in. Roku TVs are made by a variety of manufacturers and integrate Roku's interface and capabilities. Sony integrates Android TV, which, while not our top choice in streaming media systems, is a step up from the average Smart TV. On top of that, LG offers a solid Smart TV interface that allows for screen sharing (from select devices) with its Magic Mobile Connection feature.

SEE ALSO: How to Cut the Cable Cord: 6 Steps to Stream TV and Save Money

So, which device wins for content? Definitely Roku (or Roku TV), but other stand-alone streaming players are also solid options, depending on what you want to watch. For a Smart TV, LG, Samsung, and Sony all offer respectable streaming options... but not quite the best.

Interfaces Vary From Brand to Brand

Software in a Smart TV can feel like an afterthought. TV manufacturers are, after all, TV manufacturers — they're working to create the most impressive screens they can, while slapping a "Smart" label on the box to impress consumers. Companies that make streaming media players are more invested in making software that's easy to use. But because each manufacturer uses its own system, this varies from brand to brand. Along with their respectable content options, LG (running webOS), Samsung (running mobile OS Tizen), and Sony (running Android TV) all provide decent interfaces. LG's and Sony's are even customizable.

SEE ALSO: Everything You Need to Know About Streaming Media Players

The most notable feature you'll find on streaming players — but few Smart TVs — is universal search functionality. That lets you search multiple streaming services at once, and it's a huge time-saver when you're navigating the multitude of streaming services. Amazon Fire TV, Android TV, Apple TV, Chromecast, and Roku all offer their own universal search function; on the Smart TV side, you'll find it on Sony and Panasonic sets.

The usefulness of universal search goes back, again, to the number of channels available. The more channels a device can search, the better universal search is at finding what you want. This again gives Roku an edge.

Apps and Games Are Better on Certain Devices

While Smart TVs focus on what you can watch, Apple TV, Fire TV, and Android TV let you access select games and apps for iOS (Apple TV) or Android (Fire TV and Android TV). Roku has some games, as do certain Smart TVs. But other than the offerings from Sony, which uses Android TV, they're all fairly lackluster.

This isn't a big deal if you only want to watch TV and movies. If you're looking for more than movies, however, a streaming player has the variety you want.

Every Streaming Device Is Different

It's hard to say if a streaming media player is definitively better than a Smart TV because each player and each TV are different. As we've said, LG, Samsung, and Sony all produce Smart TVs with good interfaces and a respectable content selection, which makes them competitive with streaming media players. Because Roku TV and Sony Smart TVs have integrated Roku and Android TV players, respectively, those Smart TVs are just as good as having a stand-alone device — but for everything else, it's a toss-up. In the end, what's better really depends on what features you want.

Unless you just can't deal with another remote, a stand-alone player is typically a better way to stream to your TV.

When shopping for a new TV, you'll be hard-pressed to find one that isn't Smart — meaning you're likely to have Smart features even if you won't use them. If you're on a tight budget, even if your Smart TV isn't the best way to get streaming media, it's probably good enough. However, the Chromecast, Fire TV Stick, and certain Roku products cost less than $50. (During the holidays, you're likely to find them for much less than that.) So why settle for a potentially second-rate Smart TV when you could have a streaming media player? Unless you just can't deal with another remote, a stand-alone player is typically a better way to stream to your TV.

Readers, what streaming devices do you use, and how do you like them? Have you found any Smart TVs that do as good of job as a streaming media player? Let us know in the comments below.


Contributing Writer

Originally working in IT, Elizabeth now writes on tech, gaming, and general consumer issues. Her articles have appeared in USA Today, Time, AOL, PriceGrabber, and more. She has been one of DealNews' most regular contributors since 2013, researching everything from vacuums to renters insurance to help consumers.
DealNews may be compensated by companies mentioned in this article. Please note that, although prices sometimes fluctuate or expire unexpectedly, all products and deals mentioned in this feature were available at the lowest total price we could find at the time of publication (unless otherwise specified).
You might also like
Leave a comment!

or Register
6 comments
Harv1
Earlier this year I would use the Skype application on my Smart Samsung TV. The app worked great. It would log me in to Skype when I turned on the TV and notify me when a call was coming in and prompt me to accept or not. Support for the app was dropped so I am looking for a replacement. I have a good Logitech USB web cam with a built in microphone and am looking for a good device. Ideas?
harpervalley300
@Brightshade:
You pretty much summarized the real deal. This article was rather unnecessary I think.
Brightshade
Great topic to cover!

The rate of change in streaming services is much, much faster than most people replace their TV sets, plus big-screen TV sets are still far more expensive than streaming players. YouTube no longer works on my 2010-era 60 inch plasma that cost $1,200; YouTube has no problem on the much-cheaper Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, Google Chromecast.

It's more cost-effective to replace a $100 or cheaper streaming player that is regularly updated or inexpensive to replace than a TV that cost $600 to $1,000 and is rarely -- if ever -- updated by its manufacturer.
natew
My Vizio streams both 'Red' and 'Green' with no issues whatsoever.
Uberleet
" Vizio Smart TVs won't stream Amazon"
My vizio E601I-A3 streams amazon video just fine. In fact it even has a dedicated button on the remote for amazon video as seen here: https://www.amazon.com/...detailpage?ie=UTF8&psc=1
I see several other Vizio remotes that have the dedicated button as well.
jodysmith
One aspect you forget to touch on is lifecycle / software updates. I have both a Vizio and LG smart TV and the manufacturers have stopped updating the software on them. Since two major streaming services (lets call them 'Red' and 'Green') updated some server side streaming methods, the TVs now have playback issues and menu navigation issues (TV app doesn't know how to access/function with new options). From here forward when I need a new TV, I'll opt for the less expensive "dumb" version when possible and continue using my separate devices since the makers are constantly updating them.