Are Microsoft's Hologram Glasses Cool or Not?

Imagine, HoloLens can hang a virtual calendar on your real wall!
Published
HoloLens Rocket

On Wednesday, Microsoft announced that it will dive into the virtually untapped world of holographic computing with their upcoming HoloLens. But before you go imagining Star Trek-like holodecks, where Data dresses like Sherlock Holmes to solve crime, allow us to adjust your expectations a bit. A lot more like Virtual Reality than a true hologram, it requires the user to wear a headset to see 3D "holograms" that can interact with the environment around them.

Like Google Glass Glued to a Kinect

To over-simplify it (in a way that would probably make the Microsoft engineers weep), HoloLens is essentially an Xbox Kinect glued to two Google Glasses, then fit into a pair of giant sunglasses (like the kind grandma wears after she's been to the eye doctor's). The two Google Glass-like projectors display a stereoscopic image onto the sunglass lenses, tricking the users eyes into seeing 3D images. The Kinect-like bit gives the headset spatial recognition, the images that the user sees can interact with the environment.

In this way, the images that HoloLens "projects" don't have to be floating in space, but can be "attached" to a point in real space. Imagine, HoloLens can hang a virtual calendar on your real wall! Or a 3D model you're working on can look as if it's sitting on your desk at work! Of course, no one else will see these things, so an outside observer will see you reaching out and waving your hands in the empty air. Were it not for the clunky glasses that allow all this to happen, those around you might think you've gone off your rocker as you reach out to spin a virtual globe, or pinch a virtual map.

Lawnmower Man VR

Rebranding as a "holographic" system and avoiding any mention of "VR" was a very clever move on Microsoft's part as "virtual reality" immediately calls to mind terrible 90s films about Lawnmower Men and brings with it a certain hilariously awful stank of failure. "Holograms" sound way more exciting and current.

What Counts as a Hologram Anyway?

However, coolness aside, using that term immediately sidetracked our office discussion and we began debating what a "hologram" even is! Some of us argue that a hologram shouldn't require glasses to be seen. Think of Star Wars: Did Darth Vader need to wear special glasses to see Emperor Palaptine? No — though now that we think about it, Vader was kinda wearing special equipment. Anyway!

Others around here tried to argue, "Who cares, it's still pretty cool."

What do you say, reader? Are these holograms? Even if they're not, is it still cool? Let us know in the comments below!


Jeff Somogyi
Contributing Writer

Jeff Somogyi is constantly trying to come up with ways to surprise and delight audiences the world over. He takes humor seriously ... too seriously. (Honestly, we've never seen him laugh ... it's kinda creepy.)
DealNews may be compensated by companies mentioned in this article. Please note that, although prices sometimes fluctuate or expire unexpectedly, all products and deals mentioned in this feature were available at the lowest total price we could find at the time of publication (unless otherwise specified).

Comments

Leave a comment!

or Register
15 comments
The_Cam_Man_123
I don't think these are holograms. I think they're visual/digital projections tricking your brain into thinking they're there. I believe a hologram is a 3-dimensional image that you can view freely without any special equipment to wear on you. But, I still think they are awesome!
The_Cam_Man_123
I don't think these are holograms. I think they're visual/digital projections tricking your brain into thinking they're there. I believe a hologram is a 3-dimensional image that you can view freely without any special equipment to wear on you. But, I still think they are awesome.
HowardaC
@vanfanel1car

As you put it:

"Umm yeah...."

You saw a prototype, not a commercial product on both counts. The O.R. has raised a metric ton of money, had two dev kits solely funded by idiot fans, was acquired by one of the biggest companies in the world and it STILL isn't one day closer to being released.

It's stuck in concept limbo, just like Sony's Version, just like Microsoft's version. If you think that even a fraction of the things shown at CES ever get put into full on production then it is YOU that are showing their ignorance. I mean just off the top of my head how about Microsoft's interactive multi-touch table, or for that matter ANY of the companies augmented reality concepts thought up over the last 15 years? Yup... never released.

I mean seriously man, saying a product is relevant and on the way just because it's showcased at CES is like saying the concept car you saw at the auto show will get released... odds are it won't.
dealnews-bglaser (DealNews)
@triplediomonds Sometimes, our writers offer their thoughts on the value of a major new product or service, or we solicit your thoughts. And we are critical or supportive of any company when we see fit- including Apple, like when we said that the iPad mini 3 was not a worthwhile upgrade (http://bit.ly/1GHy6R4).
vanfanel1car
@HowardaC Umm...yeah, oculus rift talk is even bigger now than it was a year ago. At this year's CES alone it was the biggest whisper on the show floor "Did you check out the crescent bay prototype in oculus booth?..." Sony will say something when there's something further to say. To say that VR is junk and isn't being discussed shows your ignorance.
HowardaC
It's junk. VR tech is always a dead end. Remember just excited people were about the Oculus Rift just a year or so ago? Do you hear anyone talking about it now? What about Sony's version?

Yeah it's because to fool the eye you'd need a quad resolution display or higher AND motion tracking AND augmented reality. All of it has to work flawlessly as well. That equates to a device that is super expensive.
triplediomonds
I thought you reporter's were to report on deal's, I'm getting real tired of you reporter's mocking Microsoft and sucking up to apple all the time. keep mocking Microsoft and I will be deleting you!
l1onheart
Quote Rebranding as a "holographic" system and avoiding any mention of "VR" was a very clever move on Microsoft's part as "virtual reality" immediately calls to mind terrible 90s films about Lawnmower Men and brings with it a certain hilariously awful stank of failure. "Holograms" sound way more exciting and current. Quote

This writer simply don't know anything. VR? do you know what the hell is VR? VR stand for virtual reality and Microsoft Hololens isn't VR but it is an AR. What is AR? AR stand for Augmented Reality. VR and AR has some similar but they are different.
Terry1
I think its a good idea, But 1st gen will probably be very rough. Projecting on the inside of the glasses sounds like a good lower price point choice (cheaper then those high def phone screens), but will it produce 1080 or 4K to give a more real look, instead of a fuzzy overlay or color saturated overlay of the world. I would like to see how they deal with lag. I hope this does not mean Microsoft is not making VR headset for Xbox....

If they put Cortana on Xbox one to interact with headset, I'm sold!!!

I can imagine all the accessories this tech will open the market too and all the 3D printer things you can make to interact with augmented reality!

FYI: a Hologram that needs to be seen through glasses is called augmented reality. If you can only see an image in the glasses and no reality then it's Virtual reality, and if you don't need glasses to see augmented reality, that's called Hologram (my opinion).
ninny1176
I think it's remarkable how it interacts with the environment in the field of view. What I think is one of neatest features is that it doesn't project an image on a screen, instead projects images onto your retina in the same manner normal light does...this allows the device to provide images that are almost seamless to the real world.
JABrwoky13
I'm not saying this won't be cool, but if you look up the definition of a hologram, I would say this classifies as virtual reality. Looking forward to trying it out.
nimer
@Heyitsrick, I am on my fourth iPhone, and use many of Google products and services, but 100% agree with you. People find joy in mocking Microsoft, unfairly.

God knows MS did their share of mistakes, but I have to say since 2013 they have been doing all the right things.

Let people laugh all they want, Microsoft remains a BEAST and their corporate world ($$$$) footprint is bigger than all other competitors combined. Microsoft is also doing great things with enterprise service cloud service, competing with Oracle and even SalesForce.
Heyitsrick
Let's be honest: If this were Apple or Google, this would be touted as the greatest invention ever. But since it's Microsoft, the discussion needs to be "is this cool?" Lame.
nimer
This is the future! Microsoft gave us a peak into our future: A PC with voice assistant that's 'always on', an 84 inch tablet (now for corporate, but soon we'll see smaller versions at home), and last but not least augemented reality glasses.

Material of Science Fiction is now a reality!
Cilvre
this is augmented reality more than holographic technology.